Wednesday, July 6, 2011

"Waiting" for Whom??

So I watched Waiting for Superman. I am vastly familiar with Michelle Rhee, Geoffrey Canada, Wendy Kopp (who does not appear in the documentary), the KIPP guys, etc., etc. As I watched this film and have, over the past several years, listened to the messages that the film and these individuals are repeating over and over and over again is one idea: we need better teachers. Hmmmmm......really?

Now, let me say that yes, great teachers are key in any educational institution. You cannot have a school filled with 30-year tenured veterans who hate their jobs and are just showing up to collect a check and health insurance until they can hopefully retire in a couple years. You cannot have a school filled with people fresh out of college who aren't willing to stay in one place longer than two days before they run for the hills. You need dedicated people in this field. People who are unwavering and unshakable and who are willing to fight this education battle each and every day. However, all of these "superhero" folks in the education debate are solving the whole public education catastrophe about as quickly as NCLB has. Yes, there are some terrific ideas such as the charter school movement that has helped so many young people in under served communities gain better opportunities and a focus toward attending college and become career oriented. The idea of the charter school is pure in it's intent: let's take kids and parents who "care" and put them in an environment with a rigorous curriculum, make parents come to conferences, and give kids the tools to attend college while hiring teachers who won't be tied to unions and tenure. Most charter models make the school day longer and teachers are required to be there from 7am-5pm and most come earlier and leave much later and are required to give out personal phone numbers and emails in order to be "on call" to their students at virtually any time of day or night. But what about everyone else? What about the majority of the other students in the inner-city who get left out because they didn't win the charter school enrollment lottery?

To another issue, when Michelle Rhee came on the scene, she took to firing "bad" teachers and shutting down "bad" schools. She created the DC Impact evaluation system that put tons of pressure on teachers to perform at a much higher level and hold schools more accountable for poor performance. Even though, since Rhee was ousted from her role as DC Schools Director, DC Impact has been facing scrutiny for unfair mechanisms within its evaluation formula, other school systems, such as Memphis City Schools have picked it up to help inform their teacher evaluation process.

My point is that while charter schools, harder hitting evaluation systems, and threats of shut downs for failing schools make sense on paper, none are completely solving the problem. The problem lies within the community that surrounds the schools. Waiting for Superman implies that schools are failing the neighborhoods that surround the schools. I argue that not many other people outside of teachers and schools are being looked to as saviors of these poor and failing communities. The pressure is all on teachers and other school officials to save these kids. People look at teachers as almost other-than-human. Can we really pay teachers $35,000 a year, give them insufficient resources, insufficient training and professional development, and then turn around and ask them to save the world? Most teachers I know are doing the best they can with what they have with both the resources they have and people they teach.

In order to attempt to round out this post, I offer this: we have to change our way of thinking and reform the entire public education system, the one that exists now. Unless charter schools are going to be looked to as the new way of doing things and eventually all current public schools, primarily those in the inner-city, are going to be transformed into charter schools (which I am not certain is the right way to go about solving the problem), then something has got to give. We must start with the root of the problem: the communities that surround these failing schools. Schools need to open their doors to parents and other community members by not just offering job skills classes, medical assistance, housing advice, etc., but to show parents and other stakeholders that what is going on in the schools in their communities is important. What better way to help these young folks who attend our schools feel a sense of importance in our world, where they otherwise often do not, than have people who live around them be supportive of the work they are doing behind the school walls? Better yet, let's take our kids into the communities to focus on helping solve the problems that exist within them. Let's grow food in the school yards and have community dinners. If "public education" has such a negative connotation, then let's change that notion. No better way to do that than do whatever it takes to help people become more informed of the importance of education and that it does in fact almost always lead to a better life situation than welfare and poverty. Education, more specifically public education and public school teachers and administrators should not be seen as the problem with our country. The public education system needs to be viewed as a purposeful and beneficial right for all people of the United States: a way to gain knowledge, personal freedom, a viable career, and create so many other opportunities. I am working to develop a plan of action to do just this. I want to blow the roof off of the current system and transform our public schools into a thriving community of not just teachers and students, but also include the people within the neighborhoods that surround our schools. I believe that when we can bring all members of a community to the table and show them that when they are promoting education, not belittling it, then students will begin to thrive and failure rates will go down and graduation rates will go up. It will take some heavy ground work to get people interested, but that should not be an excuse. Reaching out to community members, speaking positively about public education, showing off the hard work students are doing, and working with students to help solve social problems will, in my opinion, be the key for not only public education survival, but also for advancement of the communities that surround schools and it will take a lot more than teachers at the schools to create this change.

I will end today with this last thought: Let's take the blame off of public school teachers and start looking to the root of the problem. It's not simply the teachers' fault that communities are failing. It's not simply the fault of the communities that school's are failing. It's everyone's problem and we are spending too much time pointing fingers and not enough time taking action. If you are waiting for a superhero, then good luck.

3 comments:

  1. Communities, I have found, have lots of suggestions to answer their criticizes...yet most of the community does not enter the school, know the teachers, nor know what the curriculum is that is required to be taught. I welcome the parents each year to attend my class, ask questions, and support the idea that all disciplines create a stronger student academically, socially, and one day professionally.
    I further believe that the community which is the most important to the administration is the community that sits with them at athletic events and votes the board back in term after term. All community voices and interests deserve to be heard and receive response.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that we have to address the problem of failing communities not just failing schools. Poverty is at the root of so many social problems. To transform education I think that we have to work on this social problem as well as create true equality of opportunity in this country. And just to be clear, what I mean by this is not equality of outcome but a true meritocracy in which everyone has an equal chance to succeed. I think that we like to tell ourselves that this currently exists in this country but there are many structural inequalities that prevent that from being true.
    (I would argue, however, that Geoffrey Canada's Harlem Children's Zone is focused on community development. I know that he starts with parents by involving them in Baby College, which is designed to teach them how to suppport their child's early learning needs.)
    I do have one question about teachers. As I understand it, it is extremely difficult to fire a bad teacher, or at least a tenured one. Is this true? And if so, should this be changed? I understand that the definition of "bad teacher" may be a little murky, and maybe you can talk about how that is defined currently.
    And finally, I wanted to make a book recommendation, Unequal Childhoods by Annette Lareau. It examines some of the cultural differences that exist between social classes which results in different childrearing practices. I think it's useful reading when examining the educational system.

    ReplyDelete
  3. To Mom's point: Opening doors for people is not enough. My goal is to show people (namely parents and other community members/stakeholders) how to work with our schools and and teach them why education is important for their children so when teachers do open their doors parents are walking right in. Most of the community currently does not have a quality view of public schools, so I am attempting to change that mindset.

    To Melissa's point: I agree 100% with your argument that we need a meritocracy based system where all people have equal opportunity to become successful. As far as Geoffrey Canada goes, he is an incredible person with incredible ideas and I was speaking more toward the film than the actual people (for the most part). I think we need more Geoffrey Canadas and probably shouldn't have included him in my list. As far as the charter school movement goes, I also support that and didn't mean to sound as if I didn't. I believe the successful charter school systems like Yes, KIPP, LEAD, Cesar Chavez, etc, are doing great things for kids who otherwise would most likely have not succeeded in the way they are doing now. My issue lies within the fact that the charter school movement is inequitable to a degree because it is exclusive. I understand why it has to be, but my goal is to develop the neighborhoods that surround the schools and enlighten them to the fact that education is the only way out of this mess we have gotten ourselves into. I am going to talk more about this in my next post.

    On the teacher tenure situation, you are exactly right, tenure is still as you described it. It only takes 3 years in most school districts to achieve tenure and you can literally teach from age 24 to 65 and never be fired no matter how "bad" of a teacher you are, short of molestation or other drastic actions. Tenure is a ridiculous idea and it should be done away with. Charter schools do not typically deal with unions, so there's another good thing about them. Once again though, because public schools do deal with unions and have tenure agreements, then they have to deal with the "bad" teachers. There are some really horrible teachers out there and I have seen them. However, in my personal experience, I have seen more good/great teachers who simply are getting run over by the system and giving up. That has to change too. It's too easy to say teachers are failing the schools because they are the people who have direct access to children each day. However that's not the sole problem or even the majority of the problem in my opinion. I will address this further later as well.

    Finally, than you for the book recommendation. I will for sure check it out and am excited to read it.

    Thanks for the comments!

    ReplyDelete